Legal Opinion

Barber v. Wooten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1951No. 21Published

1Opinion of the Court

66 S.E.2d 690 (1951)

234 N.C. 107

BARBER

v.

WOOTEN et al.

No. 21.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 19, 1951.

McMullan & Aydlett, Elizabeth City, for plaintiff, appellee.

Frank B. Aycock, Jr., Elizabeth City, for defendant Wooten, appellant.

J. Henry LeRoy, Elizabeth City, for defendant Layden, appellant.

John H. Hall, Elizabeth City, for defendant Scaff, appellant.

STACY, Chief Justice.

The case is controlled by what was said in Hester v. Horton Motor Lines, 219 N.C. 743, 14 S.E.2d 794; Lewis v. Hunter, 212 N.C. 504, 193 S.E. 814; West v. Collins Baking Co., 208 N.C. 526, 181 S.E. 551. It will…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Tarkington v. Printing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Lewis v. . HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API