Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Welles

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1900No. Nos. 11,878-(192)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the district court for- Hennepin county by Joseph P. Wilson and Charles A. Gilman against Catherine J. Welles and another, as executrices of the will of Henry T. Welles, deceased, to recover $13,460 and interest, on an express trust declared by decedent.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for- Hennepin county by Joseph P. Wilson and Charles A. Gilman against Catherine J. Welles and another, as executrices of the will of Henry T. Welles, deceased, to recover $13,460 and interest, on an express trust declared by decedent. The case was tried before Elliott, J., who made findings of fact, and as conclusion of law found that plaintiffs were entitled to an accounting, and that, in stating the account defendants should be credited with certain sums and charged with other sums. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, X

This is an. appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. Some time in 1872, the plaintiffs Gilman and Wilson and Henry T. Welles, now deceased, entered into a written contract or agreement in the words and figures following, omitting the description of the lands, to wit:

“This is to certify that I have this day sold to Chas. A. Gilman and J. P. Wilson 12 pieces of Chippewa half-breed scrip of 80 acres, each, making 960 acres, and numbered as follows, viz. 149, 256, 217, 181, 262, 224, 221, 187, 240, 182, 279, and 221, at $2.50 per acre, amounting to $2,400, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HayIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Smith v. GloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BurtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Jones v. HammondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Lamberton v. YoumansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Hoch v. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API