Legal Opinion

Roock v. Womer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 11, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The Building Zone Ordinance of the city of Syracuse provides that a building on the northwest corner of Warner and Webster avenues in that city shall have a “ set-back ” from the Warner avenue street line of at least sixteen and forty-eight one-hundredths feet. Defendant obtained a permit and proceeded to dig a cellar and build a house on this corner having a “ set-back ” of only eight and thirty-six one-hundredths feet from Warner avenue. Plaintiff Roock owns a house and lot seventy feet west of defendant’s premises on the north side of this avenue, and plaintiffs Kaufmann own the premises…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Brown v. ShyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Southern Leasing Co. v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lesron Junior, Inc. v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  2. Daub v. PopkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Boudreau v. AlbaneseNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Lesron Junior, Inc. v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API