Legal Opinion

Udf v. State, Unpublished Decision (11-16-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1999No. 98AP-1561Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Appellant-appellant, UDF Limited Partnership II, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, affirming the order of appellee-appellee, Liquor Control Commission ("commission"), which revoked appellant's liquor permit. Appellant assigns a single error:

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ERRED WHEN IT FOUND THAT THE ORDER OF THE LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION WAS SUPPORTED BY RELIABLE, PROBATIVE AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND WAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

Because the commission's order is supported by the requisite evidence and is in accordance with law, we affirm.

Appellant was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Roy v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. A. B. Jac., Inc. v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Little Forest Medical Center v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Joe O'Brien Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API