Legal Opinion

Barton v. The Procter & Gamble Company

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 13, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01332Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLISON BARTON and JANA Case No. 3:24-CV-01332-GPC-SBC MORENO, individually and on behalf of 12 others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS 14 v. 15 [ECF No. 15] THE PROCTER & GAMBLE 16 COMPANY, a Delaware company, 17 Defendant. 18 19 Plaintiffs brought several consumer protection claims against Defendant for 20 allegedly misleading consumers about the presence of lead in Defendant’s tampon 21 products. 22 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API