Legal Opinion
Descheenie v. Bowen
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1988No. 86-2385PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
In 1971, Mary Lou Descheenie sought surviving child benefits on behalf of her son, Harrison, under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 402(d)(1). The application was denied. Ms. Descheenie reapplied for benefits in 1981, and on June 9,1983, after a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge awarded benefits on both the 1971 and 1981 applications. The Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration (Administration) notified Ms. Deschee-nie of its intention to reopen the decision, questioning the correctness of the AU’s award of benefits on the 1971…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Descheenie v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Koolstra v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- Stratton v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
- Brougham v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Smith v. ChaterDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997