Legal Opinion

In re Fowler St.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1915Published

In the matter of Bowler Street in the City of New York. On motions by the City of New York and by certain objectors for a reargument of the motion to confirm the report of the commissioners of estimate.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Siclen, J.

The city and certain objectors on Golden avenue, move for a reargument of this motion to confirm the report of the commissioners of estimate. The opening and regulation of several otherwise disconnected or unconnected streets have been consolidated into one proceeding. By means of it some desirable property is given access over a devious route to the lowlands of Flushing creek and the lowlands are given access to the business part of Flushing. Incidentally, of course, a trunk sewer serving a distant section can now be carried to tidewater. The owners of the desirable property naturally object…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API