Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden
Supreme Court of Georgia
Affidavit of illegality. Before W. S. Upshaw, judge pro hac vice. Morgan superior court. September 1, 1902. .
1Opinion of the CourtEisii, J.
An entry made by a proper officer upon an execution issued from a judgment rendered in 'a justice’s court, unless recorded upon the execution docket of the superior court of the county where the defendant resides, will not, even as between the parties to the judgment, arrest the running of the dormancy statute. Civil Code, §§ 3761, 3762; Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur. Affidavit of illegality. Before W. S. Upshaw, judge pro hac vice. Morgan superior court. September 1, 1902. . J. R. Rolland, for plaintiffs. George <& Anderson, for defendant.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nowell v. HaireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. HanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Palmer v. InmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Aldridge v. ColeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Benton & Brother v. FishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.