Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
1. When this case was before this court in Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., supra, it was held that the petition set out a cause of action for injunction and the appointment of a receiver, and that there was no error in consolidating the equity suit and the claim case. The evidence on the trial proved the facts alleged in the petition for a receiver. There is no complaint, either in the bill of exceptions or in the brief of the plaintiff in error, that the evidence did not authorize the appointment of a receiver. The contention of the plaintiff in error, as set…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erwin v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Blalock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Nowell v. HaireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Palmer v. InmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Smith, Barry & Co. v. BeardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- BENNETT ELECTRIC COMPANY v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Kirkland v. TamplinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.