Legal Opinion

Antonio Garcia-Dorantes v. Millicent Warren

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 4, 2015No. 13-2439PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

This case involves Antonio Garcia-Dorantes’ procedurally defaulted claim challenging the constitutionality of the jury selection computer program in Kent County, Michigan. In September 2001, a jury convicted Garcia-Dorantes of murder in the second degree and assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than the crime of murder. Before his trial started, Garcia-Dorantes failed to raise a Sixth Amendment challenge to the racial composition of the jury venire. In July 2002, the Grand Rapids Press published a story about a computer glitch in the Kent County…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Peter Leroy VealSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. Joseph Ambrose v. Raymond BookerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. Joseph Howell v. Superintendent Rockview SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  4. State v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. United States v. Marlon JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API