Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Nielson

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 18, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 3:92-0520-19Published

1Opinion of the Court

851 F.Supp. 717 (1994)

Legrand A. ROUSE, II, Plaintiff,

v.

Barbara S. NIELSEN, in both her individual and official capacity as South Carolina Superintendent of Education, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 3:92-0520-19.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.

February 25, 1994.

Opinion on Motion to Alter or Amend March 18, 1994.

James Lewis Cromer, Columbia, SC, for plaintiff.

Vance J. Bettis, Esq., Gignilliat, Savitz & Bettis, Columbia, SC, and Ashley Bryan Abel, of Edward, Ballard, Bishop, Sturm, Clark & Keim, Spartanburg, SC, for defendant.

ORDER

SHEDD, District Judge.

This action, as…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API