State Ex Rel. United Railways Co. v. Ekwall
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus instituted in this court by the relators, who were the defendants in a personal injury action entitled B. H. West v. United Railways Co. et al., against the defendant who as one of the judges of the circuit court of Multnomah county presided at the trial of that action. The relief sought is an order holding invalid an order made by this defendant which amends the bill of exceptions in that action by striking out the portion thereof which grants the relators (defendants in that action) an exception to an order overruling their motion for a directed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. EstesOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- McGregor v. Oregon R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Ferrari v. Beaver Hill Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Seabrook v. Coos Bay Ice Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ReyesOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Bassett v. BassettOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Johnson v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Fry v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. HecketCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.