Legal Opinion

Wolf Ex Rel. Wolf v. Procter & Gamble Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 22, 1982No. 82-130PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.

This is an action by plaintiffs Stacy Wolf, Doris E. Wolf, and Leroy A. Wolf against defendants the Procter & Gamble Company and the Procter & Gamble Distributing Company, (hereinafter “Procter & Gamble”). Plaintiffs allege that in March, 1980, Stacy Wolf contracted Toxic Shock Syndrome (hereinafter “TSS”) as a result of using Rely tampons, a product manufactured and distributed by defendants. Plaintiffs’ complaint asserts negligence, strict products liability, breach of express and implied warranty and reckless misrepresentation. They seek both…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Rich v. KIS California, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
  3. Exxon Corp. v. YaremaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Soldo v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Kenrick David v. Pueblo Supermarket Of St. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API