Legal Opinion

Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor v. Andrew Manganas and Manganas Painting Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 27, 1995No. 94-3698PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.

The defendants-appellants, Andrew Man-ganas and Manganas Painting Co., Inc., appeal from an order mandating compliance with the terms of an administrative subpoena issued on behalf of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Before this court, the defendants contend that § 10(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. § 659(b), excuses such compliance while the employer is awaiting an administrative decision on earlier alleged violations of the Act. We conclude that the defendants read the protective language of § 10(b) too broadly and affirm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States of America and Dennis J. Hanzel, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Jay T. WillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Union Packing Company of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Valen Manufacturing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Little Traverse Lake Prop. Owners Ass'n v. Nat'l Park Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. Southern Forest Watch, Inc. v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Burgess v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API