Matter of Rosenbush v. Keller
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant was not entitled to resort to the remedy of mandamus without availing herself of the right to appeal to the Board of Standards and Appeals. (Matter of Towers Management Corp. v. Thatcher, 271 N. Y. 94; decided May 19, 1936.) That Board is also empowered on a proper application to consider the argument here made on the basis of unnecessary hardship. (Amended Building Zone Resolution, § 21; see New York Code of Ordinances, Appendix B.)
The order should be affirmed, without costs.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Towers Man. Corp. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- City of Yonkers v. Rentways, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Dubow v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Reichenbach v. Windward at SouthamptonNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Radano v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.