Legal Opinion
Rubey v. City of Fairbanks
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1969No. 956PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*472DIMOND, Justice.
In a trial by the district court without a jur,y, appellant was convicted of the offense of assignation,1 a misdemeanor. The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the superior court. An appeal was then taken to this court.
Appellant’s first point is that she was not adequately advised of her right to counsel under the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona,2 and therefore her signed statement in which she admitted the offense with which she was charged should not have been admitted into evidence against her.3
City Police Officer Tannenbaum testified that prior to questioning…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Erickson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Bloom v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Miller v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- P. H. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.