Legal Opinion

McMurray v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1929No. Nos. 27,447, 27,448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Tavo actions Avere tried together; one brought by Eleanor W. McMurray to recover for injuries sustained in falling as she was about to alight from a bus operated by defendant, the other brought by her husband to recover for the expense incurred by him on account of such injuries. The trial resulted in verdicts for the respective plaintiffs. Defendant appealed in each case from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or for a new trial.

Defendant, a common carrier, operates a bus line over certain streets in the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul for the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Waterloo Savings Bank v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Wiest v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Urban v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Ball v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API