Legal Opinion

Custis v. Whitaker Const.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1996No. 95-1110PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

670 So.2d 339 (1996)

E.V. CUSTIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

WHITAKER CONSTRUCTION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-1110.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

January 31, 1996.

Writ Denied April 19, 1996.

R. Stuart Wright, Natchitoches, for E.V. Custis.

Donald J. Anzelmo, Susan Nunez Belsom, St. Monroe, for Whitaker Const.

Before THIBODEAUX, SAUNDERS and SULLIVAN, JJ.

SAUNDERS, Judge.

Defendant appeals the hearing officer's determination that its employee's stroke constituted a compensable workplace accident. We affirm.

LAW

The question is whether the hearing officer correctly concluded that claimant met…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  3. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & GraniteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gooden v. BE & K CONST.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Fontenot v. Wal-MartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Oxley v. SattlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Smith v. KINDER RETIREMENT AND REH. CENTERLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Hood v. Metro Industrial Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API