Romero v. Melbourne
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
This case contains two plaintiffs, Prescilla Romero and Dolores Tarin, hereinafter referred to as Romero and Tarin. The case also contains two defendants, Ralph P. Melbourne and Ralph Melbourne, hereinafter referred to as Melbourne.
The plaintiffs appeal an adverse jury verdict in a damage action arising out of a ear collision which occurred between plaintiffs and defendants in Valencia County. We affirm.
The plaintiffs present five points for reversal: (1) the trial court erred in submitting the issue of the contributory negligence of Romero; (2) the court erred in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lee v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Mayer v. SampsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Gonzales v. General Motors CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Apodaca v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Clinard v. Southern Pacific CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Belen v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Matter of FerrillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Murphy v. FrinkmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lamkin v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bloom v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.