People v. Binkley
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
Janice Binkley was convicted of theft over $200 and conspiracy to commit theft over $200. In her appeal of those convictions, she contends that the trial court erred in failing to advise her of her right to testify, in imposing time limitations on voir dire examination of prospective jurors, in denying her challenge for cause to a prospective juror, and in measuring the costs of the stolen merchandise by its retail rather than its wholesale price. We affirm.
I
Asserting plain error, the defendant contends that this court established a rule in People v. Curtis, 657 P.2d 990…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- People v. IrrizariNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People v. MacKeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Binkley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. RosaColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Garcia v. Estate of WilkinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. ShipmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. EllisColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.