Energy Transportation Systems, Inc. v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
These actions have been consolidated for purposes of disposition of pending cross motions for summary judgments. The parties have stipulated to the material facts. No genuine issue of material fact exists; therefore, the summary judgment motions of plaintiff and defendant are ripe for disposition.
Plaintiff seeks to construct and operate a coal slurry pipeline from Wyoming to Arkansas, and plans to lay a pipeline under and across defendant’s railroad right of way. Plaintiff brings this action for quiet title and/or declaratory judgment against the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Packer v. BirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heyen v. HartnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Energy Transportation Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HumbergCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- Simon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2000