Collegenet, Inc. v. Common Application, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff CollegeNET, Inc. brings this antitrust action against Defendant The Common Application, Inc., contending that Defendant violated the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2. Plaintiff alleges collusion among competitor colleges1 and conspiracy with their joint-venture entity, Defendant, to monopolize and restrain trade and foreclose rival providers in the admissions and online college application processing markets. Plaintiff brings the following claims in its First Amended Complaint2: (1) Horizontal Restraint of Trade in the Admissions Markets; (2)…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Tech., Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019