Legal Opinion
Cooper v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 7, 1937No. A-9077PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.
The first assignment of error was that the court erred in permitting the state to introduce the photograph of deceased. The photograph was taken about two days after the death of deceased. There was a controversy between the state and the defendant as to whether an eye of the deceased, which was black, had been caused by the fluid used by the undertaker when the body was embalmed, or by the defendant striking her at the time of her death. The jury heard the testimony on both sides, and had the opportunity to hear all the facts in reference thereto. Under these circumstances, and the general…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cowley v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Gibbons v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Morris v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Irby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- Kent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
- Igo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.