Legal Opinion

Mound v. United States

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided December 13, 2017No. 4:17-cv-04089Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES CHANDLER MOUND, 4:17-CV-04089-KES Movant, vs. REPORT & RECOMMENDATION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. INTRODUCTION Movant, James Chandler Mound, has filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Docket No. 1.1 Now pending is a motion to dismiss by respondent the United States of America (“government”). See Docket No. 15. Mr. Mound did not file a response to the motion. This matter has been referred to this magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API