Legal Opinion

Talbot v. Doran & Wright Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 7, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by Ashton B. Talbot against Doran & Wright Company, Limited. Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion to vacate an order for an examination of its officers before trial, and for the production of its books and papers.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The defendant corporation holds itself out as engaged in the business of broker, buying stocks, oil, etc., in the city of Hew York. The plaintiff, residing in Philadelphia, transmitted, through one Fleshman in that -city, orders to defendant, in August, 1888, to purchase and sell oil for him on commission, depositing with Fleshman margins aggregating $5,900, all of which were received by defendant, less Fleshman’s commissions. On August 31, 1888, the transactions were closed by an order from plaintiff to defendant to buy oil to close the account. Fleshman reported that it had been done, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schepmoes v. BoussonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
  2. Central Cross-town Railroad v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1877
  3. Kirkland v. MossThe Superior Court of New York City · 1882
  4. Judah v. LaneNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Drake v. Weinman & Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  2. Fatman v. FatmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  3. McCready v. HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. McGready v. HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Rosenbaum v. RiceNew York Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API