Legal Opinion

Drake v. Weinman & Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 1, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by Walter S. Drake against Weinman & Company, a corporation. From an order denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination before trial of certain of defendant’s officers, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGrlEG-ERICH, J.

The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey, doing business in the city of New York, and claims its business to be “the purchase and sale of stocks and bonds.” The plaintiff resides at Brockton, in this state, and, in his affidavits to procure the examination of certain of the defendant’s officers before trial, he, in substance, alleges that prior to February 27,1894, he received from the defendant company a circular or prospectus setting forth the alleged advantages to be derived by the investment of money in what was therein styled as their “Special R.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carter v. GoodNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McGuffin v. DinsmoreThe Superior Court of New York City · 1878
  3. Greene v. CareyNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Talbot v. Doran & Wright Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  5. Fatman v. FatmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bloodgood v. SlaybackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Press Publishing Co. v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Rosenbaum v. RiceNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Caldwell v. LabareeNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Drake v. Thompson & Deer Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API