Legal Opinion

Plumlee v. Masto

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 17, 2008No. 04-15101PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

The Supreme Court has held that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to counsel who is free of conflicts of interest. It also has held that a defendant does not have a constitutional right to an appointed lawyer with whom he has a “meaningful relationship” so long as the lawyer acts as the client’s advocate. In this case, appellant Lary James Plumlee contends that he was unconstitutionally forced to represent himself when the Nevada state trial court refused to replace the Public Defender’s Office,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. United States v. VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Larson v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Dean Carter v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Miller v. BlacketterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Moore v. CHRONESDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API