Legal Opinion

Baumann v. North Pacific Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 21, 1998No. 9602-01135; CA A94399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Plaintiff insured appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant insurer. Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s interpretation of the "owned property” exclusion in his insurance policy to exclude coverage for the environmental cleanup costs he incurred. We affirm.

Plaintiff is the owner of real property in Milwaukie, Oregon (the property). Defendant provided homeowner’s insurance 1 to plaintiff. In October 1995, plaintiff contracted with Goodman Bros., Inc. (Goodman) to decommission an underground fuel oil storage tank located on the property. A soil sample…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Horton v. Prepared Media Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. RohdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API