Legal Opinion

Estate of Isringhausen v. Prime Contractors and Associates, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 29, 2008No. 4-07-0345PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Prior to Lee R. Isringhausen’s death, he had entered into a contract with APM Custom Homes (APM), a Florida corporation, to build a custom home in Marco Island, Florida. Lee provided APM with a $100,000 deposit. Although APM returned some of the deposit following Lee’s death, APM retained $42,500 for its construction-management fee. Susan Isringhausen, as the executrix of Lee’s estate, filed a breach-of-contract claim against APM for the sum of $42,500. The trial court dismissed Susan’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Susan appeals. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Correspondence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Rollins v. EllwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rosier v. Cascade Mountain, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Viktron Limted Partnership v. Program Data Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. Hemi Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Philos Technologies, Inc. v. Philos & D, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Madison Miracle Productions, LLC v. MGM Distribution CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Cardenas Marketing Network v. PabonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP v. City of East ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API