Legal Opinion
Hill v. Eads
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 24, 1998No. 21892PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Plaintiffs sought to enjoin Defendant from interfering with their removal of a building from real property owned by Defendant. Following non-jury trial, Plaintiffs received the relief requested. Defendant appeals.
Review is under Rule 78.01(c). For an interpretation of that rule, see In Re Marriage of Lafferty, 788 S.W.2d 359, 361 (Mo. App.1990). “Due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to have judged the credibility of witnesses.” Rule 73.01(c)(2). Specific findings of fact were not made. “All fact issues upon which no specific findings are made shall be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chubb Group of Insurance Companies v. C.F. Murphy & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re the Marriage of LaffertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Gibson v. SharpMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Hermann v. Lynnbrook Land Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Forbes v. ForbesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blackburn v. Habitat Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Riverside-Quindaro Bend Levee District v. Missouri American Water Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Jack Randall Pearl Randall v. Federated Retail Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Letsinger v. Drury CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Goff v. CaseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.