Legal Opinion

Pillion v. Magee

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGold, J.

This proceeding, under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, is brought to compel the respondents, in their official capacities as officers of the city of Lackawanna, to audit, certify, approve and pay the salary of the petitioner as tax attorney from May 29, 1940, at the rate,of $4,500 per annum.

Local Law No. 1 of 1939, passed on January 20, 1939, created the department of tax foreclosure and real estate, and, among *699other things, provided that the head of the department should be the tax attorney who was to be appointed by the mayor.

By resolution of the common council, dated February 1,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of McCabe v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Stanford v. SummersNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Stanford v. SummersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neils v. City of YonkersNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Barile v. City Comptroller of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Richardson v. City of LockportNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API