Legal Opinion

In re Houligan

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Judicial investigation of alleged void ballots.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is a judicial investigation of alleged, void ballots cast at the annual election held in the city of Ogdensburg on the 6th day of November, 1906. The inspectors of election of district No. 1, in the third ward, returned eighteen ballots uncounted as void; and the inspectors of district No. 2, in the same ward, returned twenty-one ballots uncounted as void. The relator alleges that he and George E. Van Kennen were candidates for the office of alderman in that ward and these ballots should have been counted for one or the other.

The first question which arises relates to the citizens’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hirsh v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. People ex rel. Williams v. Board of CanvassersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. People ex rel. Wells v. CollinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. In re MerowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. ReiserUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bennett v. Board of ElectionsNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In re WinchesterNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People ex rel. Bell v. Board of CanvassersNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. People ex rel. Harrington v. CornishNew York Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API