Legal Opinion
Krasnow v. Christensen
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 14, 1985No. File 221157PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurns, J.
The plaintiff, Edward Krasnow, brings this action against the defendant, Roger Christensen, seeking to recover monies allegedly due him on a promissory note. This note was secured by a mortgage on certain property located in Fairfield. The mortgaged property was subsequently foreclosed and the note became unsecured.
The defendant raises by way of a special defense that the consideration for the mortgage represented proceeds from a joint business venture entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant, and that the nature of this business transaction precludes the requirement of repayment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Amodio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ruscito v. F-Dyne Electronics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Dolak v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- State v. BashuraConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cowart v. GrimaldiConnecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Garcia v. Itt Hartford Insurance Company, No. Cv 98-0579974 (Dec. 8, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Pantaleo v. Ravski, No. Cv 92-0326931 (Feb. 14, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Aurdal v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, No. Cv89 0101719 (Oct. 25, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Avon Financial v. Dolan, No. Cv 96-0473093s (Oct. 31, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.