Baker v. Alderman
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the following:
Dkt. 46 Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Alderman
Dkt. 47 Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Alderman, in his capacity as property appraiser for Hillsborough County
Dkt. 56 Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Hillsborough County Civil Service Board
Dkt. 64 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff
Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint asserting the following claims:
1. Violation of procedural due process in that plaintiff was not afforded an opportunity to be heard…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Sweat v. Miller Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Beatrice S. Wood and Sandra Surburg Ritter, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Orange County and Kenneth KienthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baker v. AldermanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Charles N. Baker, Kennan G. Dandar, Movant-Appellant v. Ronald Alderman, Individually and Officially as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser, and Hillsborough County Civil Service Board, Kennan G. Dandar, Movant-Appellant v. Ronald Alderman, Hillsborough County Civil Service Board, Charles N. Baker v. Ronald Alderman, Hillsborough County Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- City of Tampa v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Lewis v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011