Legal Opinion
Tulin v. Recck (In Re Recck)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 30, 1994No. 19-11107PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JAMES H. WILLIAMS, Chief Judge.
Before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed on December 10, 1993, by the plaintiff Mark E. Tulin (Tulin). The defendant, George R. Recck (Recck), had not obtained counsel at that time. Recck did secure the assistance of counsel who was granted leave until February 24, 1994, to file necessary papers. On February 22, 1994, Recck, through counsel, responded to Tulin’s motion. Tulin responded to Recek’s memorandum in opposition and Recck responded in turn to Tulin’s filing; The court thereafter took the matter under advisement.
FACTS
T…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mattson v. Hawkins (In Re Hawkins)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Roberti (In Re Roberti)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Angus v. Wald (In Re Wald)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
- Spartz v. Cornell (In Re Cornell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Gradco Corp v. Blankenship (In Re Blankenship)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009