Kier Bros. Investments Inc. v. White
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). Upon consideration of the pleadings and the arguments of counsel, the defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be GRANTED for the reasons set forth herein.
I
Plaintiff is a North Carolina limited partnership formed in 1988 for the principle purpose of acquiring an interest in a cellular communications franchise. In 1988, plaintiff retained defendant Gertrude J. White, Esq. 1 and her law firm, Pierson, Ball & Dowd,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Skillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Sindram v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- CONNECTU LLC v. ZuckerbergDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Hoffman v. FAIRFAX CTY. REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Contour Design v. Chance Mold SteelDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.