Legal Opinion

Yemini v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Austin, J.), entered November 2, 2006, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were for leave to serve an amended answer and counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“Leave to amend or supplement pleadings should be freely granted unless the amendment sought is palpably improper or insufficient as a matter of law, or unless prejudice and surprise…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whalen v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Sample v. LevadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Leibel v. Flynn Hill Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Maloney Carpentry, Inc. v. BudnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Alatorre v. Hee Ju ChunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Santo D'Angelo v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Koenig v. Action Target, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API