State v. Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
In a multiple count indictment, the state charged that defendant committed various offenses in two incidents involving different victims. Before trial, defendant moved to sever the counts involving each incident. The trial court denied the motion. Defendant renewed the motion during the trial, and the trial court again denied the motion. Defendant was convicted of all but one offense. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions. State v. Miller, 133 Or App 604, 892 P2d 1030 (1995).
The issue on review is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motions to sever. For the reasons…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Brooks v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by26 opinions
- Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LeistikoOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. DelaneyOregon Supreme Court · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.