City of Edgerton v. Slatter

The defendant contends that the ordinance in question, which is printed in the margin,1 is void *382for the reason that it is in conflict with the provisions of the constitution of the state of Wisconsin and of the constitution of the United States because it is discriminatory, in that it applies only to persons, firms, or corporations taking orders for merchandise, which persons reside in other cities or towns than the city of Edgerton, and therefore does not apply to local mercantile houses in the city of Edgerton, Wisconsin. The brief is devoted to a discussion of the question whether or not…