St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. v. Ewan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, District Judge.
The defendant in error, who was plaintiff below and will be referred to herein as the plaintiff, at the time of the injury on account of which this suit was brought, was employed by the Quality Coal Company, which was engaged in operating a coal mine near Arcadia, Kan. Cars for the transportation of coal mined by the plaintiff’s employer were supplied by the plaintiff in error, herein referred to as the *620defendant. The ears were not directly ordered from the defendant by the Quality Coal Company, but by the Maekie-Clemens Company, a selling agency for the coal company.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Winter's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Waldron v. Director General of RailroadsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- Coreland v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Pennsylvania R. Co. v. HummelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jackson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Houfburg v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. of MaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Markley v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Settle v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Garner v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.