Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Martarana

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1925No. 6599Published

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Appellee, an abutting property owner on Railroad street in the city of.' *300Marlin, instituted this suit primarily for a mandatory injunction to remove as obstructions in said street certain oil and gasoline tanks and structures in connection therewith, placed there by .the appellant, Humble Oil & Refining Company, under a lease contract with appellant, Houston & Texas Central Railroad Company, leasing it as a part of its right of way. lie sued in the alternative to perpetually enjoin and restrain appellants from placing and maintaining oils and gasoline, alleged to be high explosives, in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lee v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. City of Corsicana v. ZornTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. GaddisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. Barron v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Gibson v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API