Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Coca-Cola Co.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided November 13, 1998No. 1:96-cv-00562Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

G. ERNEST TIDWELL, Chief Judge.

The above-styled matter is presently before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment [docket no. 61-1] and plaintiffs motion for conditional stay [docket no. 64-1].

Background

Plaintiff Sheila Wolf (“Wolf’) originally filed this action on March 4, 1996 alleging that defendants, through their conduct, were liable to plaintiff for the following: 1) intentional infliction of emotional distress; 2) tortious interference with employment with defendant The Coca-Cola Company (“Coca-Cola”); 3) tortious interference with employment at Access, Inc.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Norma Rollins v. Techsouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Pens. Plan Guide P 23918v Diane L. Lindemann v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API