Legal Opinion
Alberti v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ causes of action pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e. The allegation that defendant violated 6 NYCRR 211.2 is a sufficient predicate for an action pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e (see, Ruotolo v State of New York, 83 NY2d 248; Phalen v Kane, 192 AD2d 186; Costantini v Benedetto, 190 AD2d 888). We decline to adopt the reasoning of Supreme Court in Ramos v Doesn’t Matter Realty Corp. (153 Mise 2d 80) that a statute or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ruotolo v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Costantini v. BenedettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Phalen v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Delford Industries, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- MacMaster v. SardinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. Jacques v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Hayes v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1995
- Salahuddin v. CraverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- St. Jacques v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Unifirst Corp. v. Town of HamburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995