Legal Opinion
Costantini v. Benedetto
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Per Curiam.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Viscardi, J.), entered August 14, 1991 in Saratoga County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.
The primary question presented on this appeal is whether Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint alleging common-law negligence to add a cause of action pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e predicated on violations of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, Highway Law § 103-a and 17 NYCRR part 131.*
This negligence action was commenced in March 1989 to recover for personal injuries…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kenavan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Gunzburg v. GunzburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Smith v. BessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Brahm v. HatchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Costantini v. BenedettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by12 opinions
- Malsky v. TownerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Dubois v. VanderwalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Hudson v. BoutinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Alberti v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gleavy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.