Winifred Marie Davis v. Dr. Daniel K. Wims
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION WINIFRED MARIE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:25-cv-1331-HDM DR. DANIEL K. WIMS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is Defendant Dr. Daniel K. Wims’s renewed motion to dismiss Plaintiff Winifred Marie Davis’s amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 15). Davis, who now proceeds pro se, filed a response, and Wims filed a reply. (Docs. 17; 18). For the reasons below, the motion is due to be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND At this stage, the court accepts the amended…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.