Legal Opinion

Winifred Marie Davis v. Dr. Daniel K. Wims

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided September 14, 2026No. 5:25-cv-01331Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION WINIFRED MARIE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:25-cv-1331-HDM DR. DANIEL K. WIMS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is Defendant Dr. Daniel K. Wims’s renewed motion to dismiss Plaintiff Winifred Marie Davis’s amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 15). Davis, who now proceeds pro se, filed a response, and Wims filed a reply. (Docs. 17; 18). For the reasons below, the motion is due to be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND At this stage, the court accepts the amended…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API