Custody of a Minor
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1014Procedurally the case arose Under a complaint to modify a divorce judgment, thus invoking G. L. c. 208, § 28, which looks to the best interests of the child as the guiding standard for decision of the question of custody. In conclusions of law filed by him, the judge expressed the view that the best interests of the child was the paramount standard by which he was to be guided. In doing so, he overlooked the substantial role played by the Department of Social Services in directing custody away from the natural father and to a maternal aunt. The department had been made a party to the father’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Custody of a MinorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Bezio v. PatenaudeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- In Re the Department of Public Welfare to Dispense With Consent to AdoptionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Custody of a MinorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Adoption of M.E.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In re the Department of Social ServicesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- In Re the Department of Social Services to Dispense With Consent to AdoptionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Custody of a MinorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- In re Adoption of N.N.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.