Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 20, 1942PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, Chief Justice,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The complainant in the court below sought to enjoin the consummation of an amendment to the charter of the respondent company, a Delaware corporation, by which the number of authorized shares of a class of stock would be increased. It was prayed, inter alla, that the proposed amendment be declared void, either in general, or as to the complainant and all other holders of common shares similarly situated; and that the filing and recording of the certificate of amendment in the proper State and County offices be enjoined. A demurrer to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
  2. Morris v. American Public Utilities CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  3. Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Construction Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Shanik v. White Sewing Machine CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Voege v. American Sumatra Tobacco CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
  3. Clark v. FiggeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Stevenot v. NorbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. Goldman v. Postal Telegraph, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API