In re Cohen

OPINION OF THE COURT

In this proceeding, the respondent was charged with one allegation of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained the charge. The petitioner Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the report and supplemental report of the Special Referee and the respondent cross-moves to dis-affirm.

The charge alleged that the respondent was guilty of professional misconduct adversely reflecting on his fitness to practice law based on the adjudicated findings of fact of the Court of Appeals with respect to the respondent’s removal as a Supreme Court Justice (see, Matter of…