Legal Opinion
Ohlig v. FMC Marine & Rail Equipment Division
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1981No. CA 15985, SC 27224Published
1Opinion of the Court
633 P.2d 1279 (1981)
291 Or. 586
In the matter of the Compensation of James Ohlig, Claimant.
James Ohlig, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent,
v.
FMC MARINE & RAIL EQUIPMENT DIVISION, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.
CA 15985; SC 27224.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted January 6, 1981.
Decided September 16, 1981.
Burton J. Fallgren, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner-cross-respondent.
Katherine H. O'Neil, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With her on the briefs were Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.
Before DENECKE, C.J., and LENT,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cavins v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Ohlig v. FMC Marine & Rail Equipment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Grudle v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Vandehey v. Pumilite Glass & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Smith v. Amalgamated Sugar CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.