Legal Opinion

Fruit of the Loom, Inc. v. Ken Girouard, D/B/A Two Left Feet

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1993No. 91-56338PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Fruit of the Loom, Inc. (FOL) brought suit against Ken Girouard, d/b/a Two Left Feet (TLF), contending that TLF had infringed its trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 8 1114(1); had used marks falsely indicating the origin of its goods in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); was engaged in unfair competition with FOL in violation of California Bus. & Prof.Code, § 17200, et seq.; and had diluted FOL’s marks in violation of Cal.Bus. & Prof.Code, § 14330.

After a bench trial on September 6, 1991 the district court found for the defendant. FOL appeals. We affirm.

B…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Century 21 Real Estate Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Billy Sandlin, an Individual, Dba Century Investments & Realty, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. Creative House Promotions, Inc., Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. Creative House Promotions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. GossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Avery Dennison Corp. v. SumptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Exxon Corporation v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc. And Oxxford Clothes Xx, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. Pebble Beach Co. v. Tour 18 I, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  5. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Incorporated v. Utah Division of Travel DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API